I've seen at least three Kurosawa films so far, and I'm shocked to see how different his films actually are. I was expecting him to be a Ryuhei Kitamura blueprint since Kitamura is always comparing himself to Kurosawa.
Seriously though. I don't understand why Kurosawa is known for Samurai films, because his films barely have any fights in it.
I notice his sense of visual imagery & story direction far more than I do his battle choreography. Which is mediocre at best.
Well, it depends. If you want to be entertained like a Hong Kong action film than Kurosawa is the wrong guy to turn to.
If you want more subdued less interesting but realistically depicted sword fights then yeah Kurosawa is pretty much where it's at.
Although I don't understand why people would pay money just to watch some boring ass realistic sword fights.
Kurosawa makes bank, because his films actually have compelling plots.
I wouldn't even label Kurosawa as an action director. He's more in the same vein as Martin Scorsese. A true artistic visionary.
Or maybe it's the other way around. Scorsese is like Kurosawa.
I need to see more Kurosawa films to see which is which.
I will say that Scorsese does for the American mobsters what Kurosawa does for Samurai.
The Samurai/Mafia theme is just decoration. The real draw point is the drama that unfolds, the visual direction & the characters/character chemistry that are depicted in their films.
I just saw Rashomon yesterday. I need to see it again, because I fell asleep, hah hah.
IMO, Rashomon has more in common with Killer 7 than most of these other films that people constantly bring up.
You'll honestly have no idea what the hell is going on, because every bodie's depiction of reality & truth is so different from one another.
I need to see this film again, because I fell asleep. Therefore I missed out on a shit load of symbolism.
Seven Samurai was far more entertaining imo.
Rashomon, like Killer 7 is one of those plot narratives where the viewer has to take an active part in piecing together the plot.
I fell asleep, because I wasn't in a mood to think.
Here's some of the best Rashomon speculation I've seen.
http://akirakurosawa.info/forums/topic/rashomon-the-audiencethe-truth-and-the-baby
This is the type of meticulous speculation that I would like to see for Killer 7.
I love how Kurosawa's fans recognize that there are no absolutes in Rashomon. Which is a fact that I keep trying to express about Killer 7, but no matter what people keep pressing on about answers that were never there in the first place. I guess that just shows how more mature & developed the movie going audience when compared to the video game demographic.
I think K7's main downfall in the West is that we all rely on a plot faq to define the story for us. I mean seriously everybody is always asking the same dumbass questions about K7.
The only way to get the profound answer that one seeks is to first ask a question that would net you that profound answer that you so desire.
Most people ask irrelevant bullshit such as why did Garcian kill the Killer 7.
People don't seem to realize that the term "Killer 7" is actually a word used to cover up the Union hotel murders, but I'll explain more about that in another thread.
I've noticed that in Japan the K7 theories are are far more varied. Although in Japan it's commonly accepted that K7 is politically focused. Whereas in the West we see K7 as some kind of religious fable. Why, I dunno. We tend to equate anything that's deep, or profound to the fucking bible for some reason.
His eyes looks as if they are going to pop out Razz
I think he's trying to force out a poker face look. Since this is the first time that he's ever been casted to playing the badass role. Despite the fact that he's pretty big for a jap guy.
(Logic would dictate that he'd get more action roles due to his size. Instead that Tak guy from Versus gets all the action parts.)
For some reason Abe is always playing the the big/tall dumbass oaf of a side kick role.
http://i.yimg.jp/images/talent/large/m93/m93-0111-060719.jpg