First, Japan was a closed country for centuries, meaning that foreigners were usually prohibited from entering the country. Exceptions were made for commerce, notably with Chinese traders and, eventually, European traders such as the Dutch and Portuguese. Largely, however, foreigners were not allowed in Japan.Actually Japan wasn't as closed as they were believed to be during the time of Oda Nobunaga. Nobunaga was the guy who developed most of those gun formations that were later used during the American civil war. During Nobunaga's time he welcomed & courted foreigners often. He would take the ideas that he learned from the West & expand upon them. (Which is something that Japan still does to this day, although on a lesser scale.) Nobunaga was one of those forward thinker types who thought decades ahead of most. Had he not been assassinated, I believe that Japan would be vastly superior (in both economy & political might) than the current Japan of today. (Speaking of which Nobunaga's Ambition: Rise to Power is coming out for the PS2 in Feb. 5. I can't wait for that, heh heh http://www.koei.com/risetopower/) It wasn't until the Sengoku war was over. That Japan eventually became a closed country. This imo, is due to Tokugawa's short sightedness. Tokugawa decided to close off Japan's borders in order to avoid bad influences from Foreign nations. Shortly after Tokugawa unified Japan. Tokugawa had to quell a Christian rebellion led by Amakusa. (The game Samurai Showdown is actually loosely based on the Shimbara rebellion.) Japan's borders were than closed off in order to avoid more skirmishes on the same scale as the Shimbara rebellion. At the time Japan was afraid that they would be the next (Oriental country) in line to be absorbed by the Occidental powers who have already claimed nations such as Philippines, Malaysia, Some parts of China, Formosa, etc. Since Japan no longer welcomed foreigners into their land. They could not keep up with the technological advances that occurred in the West. (Japan's situation would've been immensely different had Japan adopted Nobunaga's foreign diplomacy instead. As Nobunaga was the type who would constantly adapt to his surroundings. Whereas Tokugawa just waits for the right moment to strike. The middle guy Hideyoshi just copied whatever Nobunaga did, but he's nowhere as despotic, or resourceful as Nobunaga.) In short Japan feared of being colonized by Western authority. (Although ironically Japan has been the West's bitch since WW II, lol.)
Additionally, Japan's shift to imperialism near the turn of the 20th century resulted in a ruthless conquest of East Asia the likes of which history had not seen since the Mongol Empire, which admittedly was a significantly more successful campaign (see this map of the chronology of Japanese Expansion). There is no telling how much farther the expansion could have gone had the Axis Powers won World War II.Nah, the Mongolians were a true warrior race. They thrived on pillaging, raping & killing, and they were good at it. If the Mongolians were true Lions amongst the wild, than the Japanese were more like Hyena's who scavenged what they could. The only reason why Japan tried to conquer Asia is because they needed resources in order to survive. (Japan were sucker punched into a war that they had no chance of winning. Due to FDR's embargo of U.S. trade with Japan.) While Japan did employ a similar tactic of pillaging, raping & killing. (Which could be compared to the Mongols.) It was not in the same league as that of the Mongols. The Mongols have always given I the impression that they could do whatever they want, and get away with it. Mainly because everybody feared the Mongol's archer calvary formations. Japan on the other hand strikes moi as doing shit erratically in order to survive as a nation. The thing about Japanese superiority was really just propaganda in order to coerce the soldiers to fight for a cause that to me seemed impossible. Yet at the same time I can't blame them, because Japan would've starved to death had Japan not tyrannized Asia. IMO the Axis powers never had a chance. Italy sucked, Germany could've succeeded had Hitler not involved himself with making military tactical decisions that he had little understanding of, and Japan just didn't have enough stable resources in order to be considered a true threat. (In the long term at least.) BTW My family used to be naturalized Japanese during WW II. (We renounced our citizenship after they got their asses kicked.)
I believe Ulmeyda's interpretation of the Yakumo motivated him to create a superior people, one that is immune to several deadly viruses and that can travel across land faster than normal humans (I should note that I believe the reason for "Clemence's job" was to -*test*-('") how fast a person could travel in a supersonic car before being killed, and then to use the findings to improve that result. The ability to travel quickly on roads would be highly beneficial in a world connected by intercontinental expressways, and a group of people with that ability would have several advantages over others without it).That's interesting. I'm going to have to include that when I make Ulmeyda's file for the character page. http://www.killer7.3dactionplanet.gamespy.com/psycho.htm
Another historically cultural belief in Japan is the notion of death before dishonor. In WWII, this was taken to an extreme in the form of suicide attacks by military pilots, popularly dubbed “kamikaze” by English language translators shortly following the war’s end.That's actually an overblown belief about the Japanese. The Bushido code is often misunderstood. It has nothing to do with being an honourable warrior. The bushido code was devised in order to form a set of guidelines that the Samurai must obey. (In order to keep Samurai from pillaging & killing the local populace on a whim.) The only reason Kamikaze attacks were used had more to do with the fact that the United States destroyed every single one of Japan's anti tank guns. Since Japan no longer had the means necessary to dent the U.S. cruiser's armour. Japan had to improvise. So they used airplanes as bombs instead.
The Heaven Smiles resemble the World War II kamikaze pilots in many ways. For one, both of their names share an element of the divine (Kamikaze meaning "divine wind," and the word "heaven" in Heaven Smile). Most notably, however, is the fact that both of them are suicide bombers that come right toward you and will blow both of you up unless you shoot them down beforehand.
Kamikaze tactics, the ultimate embodiment of “death before dishonor,” were used late in the war. The first account of a kamikaze attack by eyewitnesses was a spontaneous incident on October 21, 1944 (ww2australia.gov.au, 2006, "kamikaze"). The first kamikaze special attack unit was formed before this incident, but did not launch an attack until four days later (John Toland, The Rising Sun: The Decline and Fall of the Japanese Empire 1936-1945, Random House, 1970, p. 567) It was, therefore, one of the last war tactics adopted in Japan, much like Heaven Smile was the last disease considered by Ulmeyda. Lt. Yukio Seki, the commander of the attack unit, was concerned about the implications of Japan’s resorting to suicide bombing: “Japan's future is bleak if it is forced to kill one of its best pilotsNice. I have no comment. It's already perfect as is. (The allusion between Smiles & Kamikazes.).” (Albert Axell & Hideaki Kase, 2002. Kamikaze: Japan's Suicide Gods. London: Pearson Education, p.16.) Although not as outwardly fearful as Ulmeyda, Seki’s obvious concern regarding the tactics reflects Andrei’s.
Ulmeyda’s ghastly transformation undeniably confirms the legitimacy of his fears. There is only one word for what he became: monster. I’d bet my bottom dollar that anyone who fears the threat of Japanese Imperialism would be quick to use this word to describe Japan and/or its people. Suda 51 obviously fears what he dubs the “Eastern Threat,” which certainly viewed WWII Japan as a monster. Suda has confirmed that the pulsars were launched from one of the “Eastern Threat” nations, most likely out of fear of a Japanese return to imperialism.Suda 51 is using the Eastern Threat as some kind of ironic joke that pits Japan & the U.S. against one another before the two countries blow each other up. Basically what Suda is saying is that we have a tendency to fight amongst allies more than we do the actual enemies. The Eastern threat is more of a reference to the irrational belief that Japan will return to imperialism. (Most Japanese live in their own little world, and couldn't care less about politics. Much less the world outside of Japan.) There's no such thing as Imperial Japanese anymore. Japan doesn't even have an army. (One that has the capabilities to invade at least.) If you notice it's usually Korea & China who constantly bring up misinformation & skeletons from the past in order to unite their nations toward a single goal. (Japan) China & Korea don't actually want to destroy Japan though. (Well, maybe North Korea.) It's just that the "Imperial Japanese" card is the easiest tactic to use in order to rally the population toward you own party & sets of beliefs. The reason why K7 references Article 9 so much is because Japan is like a sitting duck trapped between two Tigers. (Korea & China) The only defense that Japan has against a nuclear attack is the nuclear umbrella of the United States. However K7 paints a portrait of what would happen had an actual nuclear attack happened with Article 9 still in place. IMO I too believe that the U.S. would not make a move. The reason for that is because Japan is irrelevant in todays status quo. Japan is just extra baggage from a world that doesn't exist anymore. The climate of WW II still lives on in people's minds, but for the most part it ceases to exist in reality. The United States & the nations around Japan. (Russia, China, Korea, Taiwan, etc.) Would profit more with Japan out of the picture. (In HIK 7, it's said that the U.S. & Japan's neighboring nations are undergoing negotiations deciding on the ownership & divisions of former Japanese territory. When & if Japan gets nuked.) ---- Well that's all the nitpicks that I have. It's nothing too big, since you do have a strong foundation going on here. It's also one of the most original that I've ever heard.
What's kinda funny is that Dean Cain, the guy who played the part of Superman in Lois & Clark actually is part japanese, and looks it.
http://wetmen.provocateuse.com/images/photos/dean_cain_01.jpg
LOL!
http://www.superdickery.com/seduction/3.html
http://www.superdickery.com/dick/96.html
I'm a sociopath. Obviously I've never done anything quite on the scale as to what the atom bomb pilot did.
The only thing I would feel guilty for are the deaths of pets such as dogs.
Pets live life true to themselves in the cycle of nature.
Whereas most of us are nothing more than wasted potential influenced by the stigmata of our surroundings & our ambitions.
Some could make the argument that children are too young to be influenced by their surroundings.
These people who say such things have no idea what was going on in Japanese schools at the time. Coburn Elementary in Killer 7 is actually based off of Japanese WW II doctrine. Kids in Japan were being systematically taught how to kill.
All I have to say is that it's better for one man to bomb the fuck out of an entire country rather than to have an army of men guilty by association trying to invade an island only to come back being traumatized for life, because they had to kill a shit load of women & children who were intent on killing the American invaders no matter what the cost.
IMO that pilot was mostly influenced by the current propaganda of the time.
Japanese were made out to be less than human. Hell extend that to Asians in general. During those days people even believed that the Chinese ate babies.
(The Chinese were part of the allies during WW II, and people still believed that shit.)
I believe that the pilot actually is compassionate, and he only did what he did out of misdirected love for his country.
It's easy to rationalize the death of millions when you have been indoctrinated to believe that the targets you are killing are less than sub human.
As for people like Bush, yeah he's a true sociopath.
It's hard to tell whether or not he's smart (& it's all just an act. If it's an act than he's a socipath to the extreme.) or if he's just plain fucking stupid.
I'd say that most politicians are sociopaths. You kinda have to be to make the decisions that they make.
Most of us are nothing more than numbers & statistics.
When the Mongolians attacked Japan for the first time a storm hit decimating the Mongol forces, all that weren't killed by the storm were cut down by Samurai. The Mongols would attack again later organizing the 2nd largest Navel assault in world history against Japan. The result was the same as before, a storm hit again in although it was tougher fight then before the Samurai prevailed.That's actually where the name kamakaze came from. It was named after the divine winds that destroyed the Mongolian fleets. IMO the Mongols would've trashed Japan. (Like every other country they invaded.) Had they've been given a chance to get equal footing inside the islands.
Even though the Kamikaze technique didn't win them the war it is quite interesting the emotional force that it and other Japanese battle techniques induce.Kamakazes were used for one sole reason. To put a dent in the armour used by the United State's carrier fleets. Bushido & all that Samurai fighting spirit jazz is just rationalization or a way to coerce their own men to use themselves as bombs. Japan was fighting WW II using WW I technology. (Japan was armed for war in the trenches, not full blown Total war.) Which is why I believe that Japan didn't stand a chance. Japan lacked both weaponry & rations. They were forced to fight due to the possibility of (Japan) starving to death, because of the embargo imposed on them by the United States. Although I will say that Japan did a pretty kickass job fighting a war using only WW I technology & katanas. Most other nations wouldn't have lasted as long as they did with the outdated ass weaponry they were using. Here's a recent comment from a Japanese guy that kinda had I chuckling, because of how true his statement is. (It's also another shining example of how accurate Killer 7's political statement is.)
Aceface Says: Sunday, January 6, 2008 at I don’t believe America aligning with China anytime soon.There more gains for Washington by making Tokyo and Beijing antagonize with each other.But there will be the day when America rejects being forced to choose sides over Japan and China.And if that happens while Tokyo is still in the state of strategic restraint as we are now,we will be in one serious mess.http://ampontan.wordpress.com/2008/01/05/japanese-officials-encouraged-by-hillarys-loss/#comments
I'm a sociopath. Obviously I've never done anything quite on the scale as to what the atom bomb pilot did.I think a large number of Americans would fit the description of sociopath these days, considering how they feel that all poor people are to blame for their life, and that wars should declared without thinking them over first since they only harm people in other countries. Then again, maybe that's not a new thing, since fifty years ago people started calling any form of charity communism, and that we should nuke any country as we see fit.
The only thing I would feel guilty for are the deaths of pets such as dogs. Pets live life true to themselves in the cycle of nature.It's funny how you call yourself a sociopath when people who would never use that word to describe themselves not only care nothing about other humans, but animals either. I've noticed even kids that seem to find enjoyment in harming animals. People like that inherently need to be 'disciplined'. And not sexually. ...unless they're hot.
All I have to say is that it's better for one man to bomb the fuck out of an entire country rather than to have an army of men guilty by association trying to invade an island only to come back being traumatized for life, because they had to kill a shit load of women & children who were intent on killing the American invaders no matter what the cost.I'd have to disagree with you, as I could never bring myself to condone the mass extermination of civilians, and children in particular. Then again, I can't really say for sure how the war would have otherwise turned out. I understand that the Japanese people viewed their emperor as a god, so they may have been willing to fight to the very end, though I don't know how far Hirohito himself would be willing to take it. Even if he had no compassion for his own people, of which I can't be sure, he would probably wish to surrender before his own life were to be lost. I'm not sure what would have been the path to take that would lead to the least bloodshed, but I don't think the decision to drop the second bomb on Nagasaki could ever be forgiven, since they gave the Japanese only three days before another act of genocide was committed.
I believe that the pilot actually is compassionate, and he only did what he did out of misdirected love for his country.Nah, he's an asshole, you had to read the article about him. There's no compassion in volunteering to be the 'trigger man', and not feeling any remorse over it, whether you had a choice or not. I'd sooner piss on his grave than respect him. As for beliefs that he was indoctrinated with, it ultimately leads to the question of how personally responsible one can be when raised to hold beliefs that others would consider 'evil'. While it was the standard belief that slavery was okay in the south, many people still viewed it as an atrocity, while many serial killers grew up in households where murder was generally frowned upon.
http://ampontan.wordpress.com/2008/01/05/japanese-officials-encouraged-by-hillarys-loss/#commentsI admit I don't really follow the political landscape of current U.S. relations with Asia, so I have to ask, which party do you think has better relations with Japan? It would seem like republicans are more at odds with China, considering they're the typical conservative base that hates 'commies', but at the same time they're obsessed with free trade, and many of the lobbyists they 'do business' with are employed by corporations that are dependant on China for their business. Meanwhile, China commits the kind of atrocities democrats usually frown on, but for some reason, they're as much a bunch of pussies with China as they are with congress.